Wednesday, May 18, 2011

justin bieber smiling cute

justin bieber smiling cute. Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez



  • MacSA
    Aug 31, 02:24 PM
    I really think it's about time the Superdrive came standard on all Apple computers, it 2006 not 1996. Hopefully the MacBook will also get Superdrive in both models.





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber smiling with
  • justin bieber smiling with



  • Ochyandkaren
    Mar 27, 02:53 AM
    Ahaha, it's so much like a DS, I don't even.

    http://www.ps3hax.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/nintendo-ds.jpg

    Stupid BBC journalist Rory Cellan-Jones strikes again:

    Gaming battle: 3DS v iPad 2 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2011/03/3ds_v_ipad_2.html#comments) he wrote about the so much talked Death Of the Console.





    justin bieber smiling cute. cute justin bieber quotes.
  • cute justin bieber quotes.



  • Mike84
    Apr 26, 02:29 PM
    You make it sound as though this is such an obvious distinction that Apple could never get a trademark for "app store". But apparently this argument is not so strong in trademark law as Apple actually has the trademark already. If that were not the case how could they sue another entity for trademark infringement?

    I think all of you who believe you have trademark law all figured out should keep this in mind. Apple has a trademark for app store. Previously another company had a trademark for "appstore" which is very similar.

    You can write about the topic as though you have it all figured out but clearly your interpretation is not definitive as Apple was awarded the trademark.

    Now perhaps eventually apple will lose it or have to modify it but the fact that they got the trademark and a legal battle would need to be waged for them to lose proves that your opinion of trademark law in this case is oversimplified.




    It was.


    Can you please show me the trademark that was granted to Apple for App Store by the USPTO? You won't be able to find it because their trademark has not been approved. An opposition to their application was filed, if you didn't catch that from the text.

    Trademark is having property rights in a trade name. Apple, or any other company, can file to protect a trademark they have been using and the USPTO decides if it is too generic to be an actual trademark. I suggest you learn about the process of how trademarks.


    "How does a mark qualify for federal registration?

    To register a trademark with the PTO, the mark's owner first must put it into use " in commerce that Congress may regulate." This means the mark must be used on a product or service that crosses state, national or territorial lines or that affects commerce crossing such lines--for example, a catalog business or a restaurant or motel that caters to interstate or international customers. Even if the owner files an intent-to-use (ITU) trademark application (ITU applications are discussed in the previous set of questions), the mark will not actually be registered until it is used in commerce."

    Source: http://www.inc.com/articles/1999/10/14646.html


    Also, take a look at the Lanham Act, which is pretty important when it comes to trademark law ;)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanham_Act <-- particularly Subchapters I and II.

    Just because you use a mark does not mean you have been granted the trademark rights in it.


    So, as you can see Apple does not have the trademark to App Store. Therefore, your argument fails on that premise alone.





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber cute pictures.
  • justin bieber cute pictures.



  • cube
    Mar 24, 05:20 PM
    Actually, you are just confused and trying to back peddle:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=12245564&postcount=105

    You are talking DirectX version numbers(which already has nothing to do with what we're talking about and has no bearing under OS X) in relation to OpenCL when OpenCL has nothing to do with DirectX? Something doesn't add up here.

    I am not trying to back pedal, I was talking about OpenCL before, I've been talking about that and graphics for a while now.

    With respect to your objection, what does DirectX 10.1 mean in OpenCL terms? 1.0? 1.1?

    All I can see about Sandy Bridge regarding OpenCL is conflicting information. As of now, it has no true OpenCL.





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber smiling with
  • justin bieber smiling with



  • timbloom
    Mar 24, 01:14 PM
    This would be great, but we all know Apple and the likelihood of this happening is beyond slim. I would think it would be more likely that Apple would just offer a wider range of CTO GPU options in their machines.





    justin bieber smiling cute. Justin+ieber+not+smiling
  • Justin+ieber+not+smiling



  • Multimedia
    Aug 31, 08:19 PM
    Let's hope that those specs aren't the final ones. That they're just to clear inventory.

    I'm hoping for Merom based mac minis.. Merom costs the same so why not ?LIMITED SUPPLY of Merom for the first few months. mini will be the last to get C2D probably in November. But you've gotta give kudos to Apple for adopting the Merom Spec Yonahs into the mini right away. This way the switch to Merom in mini can be almost silent with no disruption to the flow of minis to the market.





    justin bieber smiling cute. by ieber smiling, justin
  • by ieber smiling, justin



  • Manic Mouse
    Aug 20, 06:44 AM
    But you know what I mean and you cannot possible say that they are easy inpurt methods for even moderately extended use. Or are you?

    I'm getting a little confused, are you trying to say keyboards are not easy input methods? QWERTY keyboards are FULL keyboards like the ones you and I are using to type in these forums. I completely agree with you that phone/PSP-esque multi-press solutions are not good for extended use, which is why I think the MYLO is such a good example of what can be done with a "portable WiFi" device because it has a full keyboard.

    The iPod would continue to sell "pure" (and I know I'm being contradictory as my original 1Gen iPod is a much different machine than my vid iPod but we're talking of the iPod as a basic walkman-type device) as there will always be demand for a music/media player at a fairly reasonably price. Either through attrition, improvements to current features (bigger screens, easier input methods, color screens, longer battery life, new battery types, etc) there will ALWAYS be demand for the iPod.

    As you point out, the current iPod isn't a "pure" machine either. Apple have realised that they have to continually offer new things and more functionality to continue to sell and tempt existing customers to upgrade. As a music player my 4G iPod is more than sufficient: It has a nice enough size, decent enough battery life, 40Gb of space and music will not sound any better no matter how bigger the screen is. If the iPod is only to be a "pure" walkman then there is no reason for me to ever buy a new iPod unless it breaks, which is bad for Apple. Apple realise this, and validate my point by adding extra features to the iPod like photo and video support. Things like a web browser, IM etc are also just natural evolutions of the device.

    Using your reasoning, why not add all these features and more to every TV on the market cuz, "Hey, pure machines are going to be extinct soon. Everybody has a TV so we're not going to be selling any more pretty soon... Let's add keyboards and webcams to the remotes. make 'em with wireless net access, hell, throw in Vista and a dock for the refrigerator to show you how much beer is left so you don't have to get up!!!" That's not what happens. Improvements come and are incorporated and even stick around if people like them or are weeded out in the next model. But those improvements are all related to the TV viewing experience. Remember webTV? and that was only offered as a separate add-on if memory serves.

    Actually that's exactly what's happening. TV's now are having HDD's built in, PC's are having media centre's built in. Here in the UK, with the BBC, the difference between TV and computer are being blurred. A few minutes ago I watched a TV show on this computer steamed from the BBC.

    You can innovate wothout mucking about with a winner by adding a battery draining

    Well all the things I'm proposing are software, not hardware, features. So they should have minimal effect on battery life. The new iPod will have a large screen and WiFi regardless of whether it can surf the net/IM/email, and those are the battery draining features.

    If apple feels there is a market for what some members of this forum are calling for and said market is large enough the smart move seems to me to be a new device along with that device's new profit stream, limit it's ability to cannibalize your other products in any large way. You get the idea. You don't need to make the iPod the be-all end-all device. In fact, I think if you did, you'd lose market share to other devices without the bloat.

    But that is exactly what Apple are doing: When the ipod launched it was nothing more than an MP3 player yet the current iPods are evolving into the "be-all-and-end-all" device I'm suggesting: They play games, they have a calander, they show notes, they play videos, they display photos. Has Apple lost market share by offering these things? Or would they have lost market share if they had not offered them?

    And precisely what other Apple product sales would a MYLO iPod cannibalise? What competing product does Apple offer?

    And the argument that no one wants a "utility belt" with a million devices each dedicated to one function just doesn't hold water with me. I carry a lot of gear. A laptop, a comm device of some sort and my iPod would do anything I need to do as a civilian back in the world. Obviously I carry much more here as I have the desire to make it back to the real world but that's not what the real market is.

    Like I said in my previous post, the mobile phone market (and what Apple have done with added functionality to the iPod) shows the exact opposite trend. I'd much rather have a MYLO iPod than cart a laptop and an iPod around with me EVERYWHERE I go.

    But maybe I'm the oddd man out in this argument. I hope not but I have ben wrong once or twice. My wife says so.

    Women are always right. Or so my mother tells me... :p

    I don't believe that the next iPod will be a MYLO-esque device, but eventually it will offer all that functionality.





    justin bieber smiling cute. Justin+ieber+not+smiling
  • Justin+ieber+not+smiling



  • iUserz
    Sep 21, 03:04 AM
    I have had absolutely zero problems with my iPhone 4 and love it to death. 'course I'm in Canada where we're not tied to AT&T but I haven't had a single dropped call.

    I'll make my own decision - don't need CR to hold my hand...





    justin bieber smiling cute. ieber cute. Justin Bieber#39
  • ieber cute. Justin Bieber#39



  • MaenXe
    Apr 26, 01:33 PM
    trademarking app store. How pompous. What's next, trademarking computer store, book store, pet store? LOL.

    App is shorthand for Application, it's been in use for almost 20 years: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=app

    App Store is a descriptive term for a shop selling a specific product. Such as Pet Store rather than Domestic Animal Store, or PC Store rather than Computer Store. By Apple's reasoning, the first person who used the term Pet Store should have Trademarked it and cornered the market. But since several companies started selling Pets at their Pet Stores without a Trademark, then the term was considered common place.

    Personally, I think that the terms iPhone App Store, iTunes App Store, and Mac App Store should be trademarked and would be respected by the general industry.

    Also, in Amazon's defense, there usage is Amazon "AppStore", not Amazon "App Store". So, splitting hairs, it's not the same.

    M@





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber smiling gif.
  • justin bieber smiling gif.



  • Lollypop
    Aug 7, 05:40 AM
    Finish work at 5.30pm - 1 hour of 5-a-side footy (6.00 - 7.00pm) - drive home, eat & shower by 7.30pm - turn on Mac, log into MacRumors (hopefully it'll be running!) - and laugh at all you silly bugger's who have to spend �1000's on a new Mac and display :p


    It is funny reading about how people all of a sudden HAVE to get something, or are upset about how their investment is now worthless or if apple will let them exchange their recently bouth XXX for the new model. :rolleyes:

    I would love to be able to see some of the demos of leopard, I expect a lot of it, and screenshots wont work this time!





    justin bieber smiling cute. Featuring justin , , usa see
  • Featuring justin , , usa see



  • econgeek
    Apr 12, 09:58 PM
    The auto-tracking timeline seems so obvious (in retrospect) that I think a year the UIs with 99 tracks stacked on top of each other, a new track for each tiny clip, etc, are going to look horribly complicated. They may look "professional" to people who think all information should be onscreen at once -- even if there's no video in the track, at he time range you're looking at, the track is still there.

    But it seems like this new UI will give much better control and edibility for the range of the work that you're currently working on.

    It is looking like some of the features that I think were a PITA before are better integrated here too.... if the comments about adjusting time scale mean what I think.

    A great leap forward in usability, it looks like.





    justin bieber smiling cute. cute justin bieber pics.
  • cute justin bieber pics.



  • Irishman
    May 3, 04:43 PM
    Yep, I am pleasantly surprised. I ordered one.

    The Quad i5 or i7?





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber cute smile.
  • justin bieber cute smile.



  • Spanky Deluxe
    Nov 27, 01:26 PM
    Wow, for the first time ever I actually beat MacRumors: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=3095478#post3095478

    I think a 17" model would be a good idea for Apple. It'll stop people buying Minis from getting their LCD fix from elsewhere to some extent and won't cost Apple a bean in R&D costs since they already use 17" panels in the iMac and have all the internals ready because of the 20" and 23" ACDs. It would only need a different sized chassis to be designed.





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber cutest pics.
  • justin bieber cutest pics.



  • pagansoul
    Sep 7, 12:51 PM
    I'm a collector and I love movies. I can watch something I like 5 times a year and not get tired of it. I must note that my favorite genre is Science Fiction. My DVD collection is in the thousands. I do not watch TV because I can not stand commercials but I have several sets of shows, past and current. I also have about 400 CDs. I have purchased about 10 songs off iTunes but I tend to get the CD if I find I really like the sound. With only 2 of the songs did I decide not to purchase the CD.

    Now, iTunes Movie store. For myself I don't see much use. I have downloaded for free some short films that I play on my PSP and keep on my computer. I have ripped (off a DVD) a total of 6 movies (2 are Music Video DVDs) to my iMac just to see how long it would take and the quality. Since I believe I have just about every 'public domain' b-movie made on DVD already and just about everything I want that comes on a DVD I'm not the type of person Apple is gunning for. Right now there are people using P2P for downloading movies that actually think what they are doing is legal. They pay a few bucks to some site that's based in some other country that has different laws. It's these people that iTunes wants and they will pay a few dollars to get a downloaded movie off a creditable site. All iTunes needs to do is offer what those other sites do (a bit more, since it is legal) same speed and as good or better quality.

    Side note: If Sony would drop their price for UMDs to a more reasonable price like $5 then I would not need to make my own movie copies to load on my card. All they do is put the full lengh movie on a mini DVD, why charge $25 when a full size DVD is half the price and contains extras. Sorry for the side rant.





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin+ieber+2011+smiling
  • justin+ieber+2011+smiling



  • jgould
    Mar 1, 03:20 PM
    My wife's desk:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=273823&stc=1&d=1299014496
    My current desk:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=273828&stc=1&d=1299014496





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber smiling with
  • justin bieber smiling with



  • Bacong
    Oct 21, 06:15 PM
    Got my switcheasy colors case. It's awesome. I love having all the ports connected :D





    justin bieber smiling cute. justin bieber cute smile. hua3
  • justin bieber cute smile. hua3



  • SuperCachetes
    Feb 25, 07:37 PM
    I wish there were more affordable Diesels in the States. A Cruze might be a bit "too" affordable, but neither can I step up to a Mercedes. The BMW 330d is sweet, though. I have to rule out VWs based on a personal bias. What to do... :o

    I'm really keen to see this system (http://www.greasecar.com/faq) in action. Waste oil as fuel = brilliant.





    justin bieber smiling cute. news justin bieber smiling
  • news justin bieber smiling



  • jav6454
    Mar 24, 04:09 PM
    What history? Developing crappy integrated graphics?

    I missed writing "SMALL performance edge".

    My assessment is not based on a small performance edge. It is based on Fusion enabling a whole new set of functionality thanks to OpenCL and DirectX 11 class hardware.

    I established my preference BEFORE watching that video. That Sandy Bridge performs so poor in that demo just confirms my choice.

    You got it wrong.

    Zacate, Brazos and pretty much every Fusion platform does not compete against Sandy Bridge. No...

    It competes against Intel's Atom platform. Atom CPU offerings beat the many of the offerings on the AMD side. However, on the GPU side, AMD has got Intel really well.

    Anandtech did a nice little article on this. They found the whole Fusion concept and implementation as a whole beats Intel's Atom implementation overall for the HTPC. However, down to specifics, well I just discussed it.





    justin bieber smiling cute. the lols, justin bieber you a
  • the lols, justin bieber you a



  • Spoony
    Apr 26, 02:01 PM
    Speaking for the common man (i'm not all techy like a lot of posters here)

    I never heard or used the word "App" until apple started using it. I think Apple did such a good job with it it became universal almost.

    Now the term "program" I understand. Computer Programs and Apps are the same thing.

    One is catchy and has a "buzz" word nature to it the other sounds like something i'd want to avoid.

    Hey man download that Computer Program Angry Birds to your phone.
    Hey Man get that Angry Birds app.





    CIA
    Apr 12, 08:43 PM
    I know this thread is probably full of pro video geeks so don't eat me alive here. What's the primary difference between FCP and Express aside from the fact that Final Cut Pro is packaged in a suite of applications?

    Final Cut express strips out a lot of features people won't need unless they are doing some pretty heavy lifting. I use Final Cut Pro (and have since 1.0) but for the type of editing I do here at work (small TV station) Final Cut Express would work just fine. I just use what they give me 8-).

    AKA Final Cut Express is what iMovie should be, but instead they super duper dumbed it down for the masses.





    Constable Odo
    Mar 25, 04:46 PM
    I recall some of the naysayers around here not even a year ago stating that such a device would never be suitable for gaming. And here we are. With HD output to your TV.

    Vision, people. Vision.

    Most of the naysayers believe that tilting and touch-screen gaming is for sissies. They want actual analog controllers and such. They'll never change that attitude because they what they were raised on. The younger, current group of gamers will find that tilt & touch is very natural for them so they won't be as prone to griping that the past is slowly fading away.

    I like racing games a lot and this one looks terrific. Apple needs to build a game console with two iPad2 chips in it or one quad-core ARM processor. That would make one fine low-cost system with more games than you could possibly want available. Apple would just have to work out some touch & tilt controllers for it.





    nosen
    Sep 6, 06:14 PM
    But hopefully these are a better resolution than the current TV show on Itunes. It should be at least DVD quality, If not these price model will bomb IMHO.
    agreed, although I don't think I'd ever pay more than $9.99... I'd rather just buy the DVD.





    RebootD
    Apr 12, 09:59 PM
    I hope they don't consider this a all new program and not offer upgrades.

    But then again it might be offered for cheap on the App Store anyway.

    It will be interesting if they sell it stand alone and drop motion/livetype etc.





    dpaanlka
    Aug 7, 06:08 AM
    For the sake of those who want to remain surprised until we see the video, there should be a page on MacRumors that says "will post link when video available" - so I can just check that page for the video to be uploaded later in the day. I plan to completely avoid all news until I see the video.

    Can somebody do this?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment